- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old
/ M& o) U: Y# OBoy Induced by Indirect Topical5 ^8 U Y) D% T; B5 g
Exposure to Testosterone
# |; V4 P8 ]) I/ pSamar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2
5 H) v0 @3 i1 X: h, D! E" B$ I; H- ]and Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1" o+ ~" @/ f0 J/ F
Clinical Pediatrics* E( H; a' r- {2 O, O+ _) _# {% A) W
Volume 46 Number 6
" O$ c. b- n+ {6 _! a& n4 P6 JJuly 2007 540-543
! c& G' J2 F) _6 _: p: g( q" j# f© 2007 Sage Publications
9 A: J( i3 V8 q+ m# {10.1177/00099228062966513 }% O# D2 z* j [3 j6 R
http://clp.sagepub.com
2 b M# f5 t: j* Ihosted at% G: z+ ?2 q) H d, i
http://online.sagepub.com: U. g7 @8 g8 K t h, ]
Precocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,
7 o5 r7 W$ Q: Nis a significant concern for physicians. Central- X6 @0 ~6 H' k, s
precocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated
J2 g) I- K- } _/ Z4 zthrough the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has4 Q2 F2 K# R# E8 ]0 {
a higher incidence of organic central nervous system
( K% R' N8 |, `! t# Ylesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested) @2 o$ E, Z4 h% r. @
by enlargement of the penis, development of pubic5 ?* a% w! G/ K3 u" e+ S( j
hair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-( J9 C" g8 i9 p% I# m! e
cles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We' [# B1 X% Z5 S5 G2 c/ A3 l5 `
report a 16-month-old boy who presented with the$ N& y5 V3 l& T# U' H$ I
enlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop- ^7 G7 V3 F4 \; q" B/ s) y
ment without testicular enlargement, which was due
6 j# c. f& ^6 H' e5 J8 v8 Jto the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by
: {4 P2 w4 n9 `# e7 I! ]1 _the father. The family initially concealed this infor-' \0 D' y0 E8 o9 d/ ^- j
mation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this$ M4 _. x B' M- Q- z" D. t
child. Given the widespread and easy availability of' w2 \4 s6 O/ B7 V% _7 d- a
testosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-8 e( C/ N. h0 [. B0 b" o
bly more common than the rare case report in the$ y3 K9 Q' r6 U* n5 A
literature.4
, q4 `0 r" l; ~$ T8 ]Patient Report
; ?6 _. o8 K! zA 16-month-old white child was referred to the
8 C% C. Y/ y0 @* aendocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern
. ]5 O; h5 r7 c+ Kof early sexual development. His mother noticed6 K$ }8 I E2 m2 g
light colored pubic hair development when he was
9 I! s' ^& ^5 j' D& }# A! sFrom the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of) Z( A/ W/ G0 ?- a
South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.* N6 D1 @3 O& O
Address correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,6 G! \4 w" M4 W; H: u: v
Professor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of% Z- S6 A$ s; U* F
Medicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;
* W% X, u4 G. m5 Y/ Qe-mail: [email protected].3 B4 i+ n9 N, Q1 S% w2 j
about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became% }, J8 ^7 Z' ]7 n0 f
darker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-
4 W, ?+ `; u; O# C. k3 f( Iment of his penis and frequent erections. The child9 d1 ]! R* P) B' ]$ v
was the product of a full-term normal delivery, with
+ N Y+ A8 d3 L) ca birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of, z3 e. A$ ]% x. G, c. a' F
20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year
6 X, r6 ^! K7 O. R dof life and was still receiving breast milk along with
& }/ j$ x8 E, ]) z. E# @9 tsolid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,5 e! p% F$ U6 m7 U
and his psychosocial and psychomotor development
6 t* @2 S) e: Y8 xwas age appropriate.- j: ^' d5 Q3 j# F; C
The family history was remarkable for the father,
/ t0 R. I4 G' l/ [* \4 q Wwho was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,* {' D, p D4 h8 H# `6 P
which was treated with thyroxine. The father’s. c; T% @" A8 M+ V j
height was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat
7 E% ]7 u2 q8 ^0 {+ F" z' q6 s3 n. qearly puberty and had stopped growing by age 14. S8 o, v; C; O+ p: y. Q
The father denied taking any other medication. The8 n, r" D: K S+ n. I! K/ z
child’s mother was in good health. Her menarche
6 Z- S$ n& R2 t3 P1 Swas at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet
9 W! ]6 g& b b+ Q5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-
& z4 b3 A8 v0 _0 [cocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-; `! @, e5 ~6 M$ x! p9 f$ T
tives. There were no siblings.- q1 W& R% F0 b8 |5 W/ \4 `
Physical Examination
( @. ^& i) N& ]. }6 pThe physical examination revealed a very active,
3 d. R W) {; c. q$ S% Y" Tplayful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented
& G, I8 Y* [4 a; y% x+ k: f4 Ia blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was
, b" N( f- [( \7 R; K j90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg
7 M9 l/ I1 n0 O! y3 ^(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth: c- j8 W, P s
velocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of
% o8 l+ b# c2 [- w2 g. ?the neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.$ ^! _. _4 W, p1 l3 V1 L
The genitourinary examination was remarkable for
+ R6 \6 i1 z+ ^$ s, y! Renlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of! K2 @& n7 h% x! M, E" [& `' I
8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well; w; O: T. S6 Z' i. j6 V$ t) K
developed. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around5 Z" q. G T0 G' `& @( ~! x1 J
540
7 T8 Y1 \/ s0 kat University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
; m7 F9 K7 h( U* s, ^! ?the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The; M3 `- K+ c3 M: e% H
testicular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.2 g- H: B- W% _" b2 x) M- L, d7 w
The skin was moist and smooth and somewhat0 M: U" l4 X, A, A! j, C
oily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no/ r' ?5 I# B C3 J2 b1 Z9 w
abnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.
/ r9 _6 ?/ d1 H1 kNeurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+
0 x( {6 t4 }) A5 [+ Z5 B: \bilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion
3 f0 E3 G2 N3 X, F6 J# bof papilledema.- D3 g5 |; ? \& T" A6 l# u5 a
Laboratory Evaluation
/ A7 c- E1 B# s7 `: a" }' u& wThe bone age was consistent with 28 months by
1 t. f0 J2 h% tusing the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-- ~( ^; q+ `" T* t
logic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal" A3 x( u, x* w$ Y( |
karyotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test
5 y4 h9 @7 t+ K& M5 i& K, }1 T/ Zshowed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-
! i+ a6 Q, D6 B Nlating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).
9 a& R8 ^- r8 w* Z2 V& v/ q8 PThe concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood
1 [# w1 s% c+ K2 n' Rurea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were. T y; o0 N0 E3 c& f/ ?0 ^) o
within normal range for his age. The concentration
% v- _6 v9 m% h# r: i0 I8 j- tof serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL9 k! L* N Z: R/ Q
(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20- n& c8 T' W% `
ng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-# Y& M: J+ X4 O9 n& `, C
terone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),7 m/ a/ h. |# Q
desoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to
K& E) v6 t2 R, q. L* N9 r) c49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)& K* y4 `1 Z+ z; c& r& h7 f
was 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-
1 l! {1 s6 @/ L4 H9 d3 S% Atisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total, X+ T" j @3 Y% U2 l
testosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),
$ M* M) j. {' M( `$ Fand β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than0 [' c5 B V% |7 z3 F* @% i
5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular
" I) z9 l8 A/ j2 ]9 z9 H3 Gstimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone3 W+ l6 p+ Q. H1 t( F
concentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL% o3 j1 x2 q% ~
(prepubertal).
' T3 |! p2 r* G6 U/ e- yThe parents were notified about the laboratory
3 C3 n2 b7 Z& M& i# ?8 U1 Sresults and were informed that all of the tests were- U$ M6 a: p. u' O! z0 a
normal except the testosterone level was high. The& G% `" \% D" m5 Q2 Z
follow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to
1 V, i/ u3 Z6 J4 I' L" Aobtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-
1 H2 o' e8 y+ T! G' I9 N5 oever, the family did not return for 4 months.; {% C7 r: }7 K4 s9 N
Physical examination at this time revealed that the
/ r& T' M# m5 f/ ?/ d1 wchild had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained0 \7 A) V7 t' G5 v( o, {9 V
2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained
& E0 c+ h% |; S; iunchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-
" a* `! u* i1 V8 ~! m* H+ R& T" a& X) Kpletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at4 s+ c B' F O L: q
the base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 24 @1 n! y9 _5 j2 Q! \
mL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.9 M8 V! O! o3 h# ~8 [% a3 d. d2 k
The mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-; u: V8 Y1 f" b2 N# L, F% r
ing frequent erections.* U. b$ C4 s) l9 \
Both parents were again questioned about use of
! Y; W n1 k/ [7 a* f7 d5 H9 Wany ointment/creams that they may have applied to
$ l: A( C2 \8 \9 a9 K7 |the child’s skin. This time the father admitted the
6 Y; w# O* r% W; z& oTopical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541
9 x# O8 N6 y- x% `' c$ ?7 Iuse of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-0 ^9 c$ a2 R2 }# v1 j, r
ing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for
3 b) q5 [+ h0 t6 F5 F/ W; Aa year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed
0 U6 j9 {+ V1 `" ?$ K9 w) O1 F kto disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-( D- g- I2 {4 ]. M: }. t
scribed by his family physician for decreased libido& `1 X# g1 t/ f& M4 f; G" i, o
secondary to depression.
2 @* O$ \, b2 Q; f3 U7 A9 hThe child slept in the same bed with parents., F8 b& Q8 c1 i
The father would hug the baby and hold him on his
" r$ Z+ y$ q' R; k1 J1 Mchest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-
( X* k7 [3 V. Pnificant bare skin contact between baby and father.
! I4 ?& ?8 |+ d0 z5 l. |) D1 J" JThe father also admitted that after the phone call,
u8 O9 W6 q ]* r Iwhen he learned the testosterone level in the baby s$ j F1 h0 c8 R
was high, he then read the product information1 {6 O2 |* A1 T- X* i
packet and concluded that it was most likely the rea-
& h, h" A- W$ |# Json for the child’s virilization. At that time, they
" e6 v' L, s4 d6 Pdecided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the
1 @( k7 a7 n$ ~: j5 }father was not hugging him with bare skin and had9 A' e$ |( Z- G) j0 B& R
been using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone' M" `6 I! L) X$ g+ J5 ~
test was ordered, but the family did not go to the9 l9 Y; D5 k: G
laboratory to obtain the test.* F5 L$ N+ i7 y" g9 g7 i2 `1 F
Discussion
- L0 D0 s# c9 a7 O1 D, K8 nPrecocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary# _8 Q+ Q/ ^# O( Y
sexual development before 9 years of age.1,4$ r7 y' P$ D3 T. O$ b
Precocious puberty is termed as central (true) when
- D( P# {+ H! C- }* Y7 G5 \6 ~it is caused by the premature activation of hypo-& Y% O( h$ Y, B: N0 u1 b
thalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-
1 H; o% P( L: m- q0 Fmon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP7 m0 C! f' x& R1 d
may have a central nervous system lesion that is
& i) ~ l+ A: jresponsible for the early activation of the hypothal-
" |1 U7 `# F# X# u7 zamic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-
. E: S% A9 @1 n6 E3 y6 k. ?" csis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in, l( w% D5 e) V' m
boys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-. z4 U% T- k" y4 ?6 N
ization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-1 R" C& i( }4 }9 t- S" W0 ~$ E
rical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by
+ }, o9 x- x% ]gonadotropins.1,3' e# X0 S5 F- J3 l. C
Gonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-
) R# {; F! i" A2 ~cious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate2 ~& t) W: a0 z `( `+ S$ O
androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or
. V3 H# W) K, ~; s3 Iexogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-: z+ l. ]3 x$ x+ \: A# C
ulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing- z! ?. F! N W6 c" B5 L
congenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive
+ s( N, T! f) h: n% uadrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious
1 B* C' R: ?/ T' P. ^3 I# wpuberty in boys.3,4) |) W% ~( n _1 H2 }: V% l- H3 g
The most common form of congenital adrenal. R. ~/ M3 E1 W8 R f% o" V) R
hyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.
9 v4 Z# O: G9 C: |The 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in8 M# \1 K4 `9 L9 l! B7 K
excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,
; |. V8 X% r( R$ _an adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen
' \4 F; R" V- Q. s$ M8 oexcess.1,3
v& c+ z/ x7 Rat University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
. Z% H* }* g$ G1 A$ k542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007
+ s# N1 g; ^8 x! a/ I8 nA unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-
# @' S5 O2 S7 \# ~, Yindependent precocious puberty, which is also known
( s4 c! e2 Q. M9 D# o6 o0 N3 j$ qas testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a
" | L+ P t8 w4 s. q) _' }+ x9 Y% ]very young age. The physical findings in these boys
% @3 n \' X1 o7 s. Mwith this disorder are full pubertal development,) T% m: }% i, _" l }1 g) T
including bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys, t& W' u: {9 W5 N; ]+ A
with CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder
; i! l5 I" |- l F# Hare suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show
5 j0 f0 {& r' ^: ~& L6 Q9 Lpubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-( X3 o1 [: w8 m3 L3 r- d
releasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked
, e5 a$ c U: |8 Jautosomal dominant disorder that affects only/ J y; X% r0 G
males; therefore, other male members of the family
n; I; {. v2 z" I/ o7 U3 imay have similar precocious puberty.37 {% D: Q1 p6 M, h6 R8 B/ M0 i
In our patient, physical examination was incon-
( Y' L" v& j0 e2 Jsistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-# W t. l/ b4 d! J
cles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis6 ]' d* V9 G7 k& J' j
was in the differential diagnosis because his father
2 Y/ y- v7 C& K8 w( Nstarted puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,7 K: ~% Z! K7 ?' |7 {7 K
testicular enlargement is not that evident in the; U/ I$ d& x4 [! |' |+ m
beginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-
3 ]3 O5 G- Y% U g8 ]ative initial history of androgen exposure, our8 M$ Z5 y0 {* j1 x) g9 ~! `! F
biggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,! ]: t: R" N2 w' \
either 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase8 v1 r# p0 f: J4 Y
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-
2 j# y2 x. r$ F; d# ming the normal level of adrenal steroids. x" x# N9 w) D& I7 A+ a* ^
The diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly
^3 X0 e; n+ p- n; q6 e& k6 asuspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because
2 I% _! B1 B% z% qthe physical examination revealed the complete disap-+ i1 O/ N+ f3 ~* n1 P9 {9 w+ I# v
pearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and
) v5 i8 P3 i& B+ f% k! d3 O- Qdecreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-
1 `" E2 J L& c* }# A( Gterone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was K: m& c, S3 }2 u$ r" \7 k3 t# C
using it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’
9 Y; @. L. X6 Z2 t- @" [5 KDesk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or
! G3 ?7 Q5 O5 c/ V5 G2 m9 dcream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to3 B" L0 h" |: F* Q5 s G& C# N
unprotected females through direct skin exposure.
" H" V. W: D- W) p9 I8 bSerum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the) |& j, S3 _" n$ n) \5 O
baseline value in those females who were exposed to
% G% ~4 j2 \0 Zeven 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male
' I( @$ E, Q, npartners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-, n4 p6 `& T9 v; a6 y9 ~
tion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.9 _! ^; h1 ^& p. E
Our patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,
8 @: }6 z ^4 `9 O, o. Jwhich was clearly high. Some studies suggest that
, m7 d! R# E( z. ^' A5 Gdermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-4 B v b8 ]' k! h" y
terone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more
6 h! j( o! C4 p# g- V1 H$ Qactive in young children exposed to testosterone c3 @; x4 i- q# N2 n6 F$ D8 m( p
exogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-- Z& R1 N0 R5 B* p# V0 W' Z
drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to
/ l4 \9 ?3 b; x) ^virilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in
3 I* b& V* }4 q' z9 Kchildren results in an increase in growth velocity and
, _; ` H+ } T% q8 ]5 r. b ^advanced bone age, as seen in our patient.
/ ^$ U* `8 J7 n& w9 p* S" f5 HThe long-term effect of androgen exposure during; T" r; N9 R, {% S/ U4 K% F) Z
early childhood on pubertal development and final4 Q$ o9 i) e! ?3 W0 Q
adult height are not fully known and always remain( C- ?1 q8 o) \$ r4 W# x* c7 s
a concern. Children treated with short-term testos-
7 U5 H1 C* L' g- R4 |! e$ ~( _: |terone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some
; \( J, z, }" F3 K# w5 vacceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after" K" M0 ~0 ]; \: P7 b0 ?6 D+ \( k
cessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation' J; ?% c% ^' S4 O! K9 }- ^% _3 [
decelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,95 X2 Q' P% O1 E5 C
There are conflicting reports and controversy u6 @- h+ S1 Z3 V; J( [1 g
over the effect of early androgen exposure on adult
8 y) A5 U& v1 W8 a4 w9 a; K( a6 G: Y: apenile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal1 t$ _: k9 M6 Y4 T) D
adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-; G" m; a' ^0 E, H6 p- a" u B
ulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,' p% j; E/ V( D4 T, C' @2 `9 f. |
Sutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between" K3 |: `) s- [% I
childhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult, a8 i6 w; |6 F3 ?5 H/ G. h' ~
penile length in clinical studies.
% M! g7 A7 v2 A7 A0 nNonetheless, we do not believe our patient is
' ?" d$ I. {$ V" Dgoing to experience any of the untoward effects from
* D0 z, F, [1 u5 H, [! y! |testosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because
, d, o6 _& d# X& \6 ethe exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.
! A$ k7 z9 f: ^- HAlthough the bone age was advanced at the time of3 C f, d: q2 K
diagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at
6 E7 v7 |. h4 U$ qthe follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult
4 ^. N1 B: t- m, d6 @* Oheight will not be affected.
, q8 k: |# S& ]0 q/ JAlthough rarely reported, the widespread avail-2 Z2 U4 N1 l4 `
ability of androgen products in our society may
7 o l- s- }1 U& xindeed cause more virilization in male or female4 |0 r2 s9 m0 l' D" }8 |
children than one would realize. Exposure to andro-; c, X5 I% H7 c$ u- g/ a
gen products must be considered and specific ques-' Z7 N6 ~, J7 {. p; R; s
tioning about the use of a testosterone product or% u: S# [4 b* ~+ U- j
gel should be asked of the family members during$ [, T) [! d2 ]5 E0 D) f5 D
the evaluation of any children who present with vir-
& B% ]" z. ?/ S) a1 bilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-4 j$ c4 ~$ k2 H7 W7 [) N* n
nosis can be established by just a few tests and by+ ]' r6 H( ~; u, Q; U. M
appropriate history. The inability to obtain such a
' }( r* \* x8 Ahistory, or failure to ask the specific questions, may% I4 ~6 Z0 Q+ `' o5 f
result in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive0 J, R. A# C: N% L4 A
investigation. The primary care physician should be
( v1 a; D) H) `6 V$ `0 Y1 g3 Baware of this fact, because most of these children, F Y8 n4 y5 P, p" S4 ?- H* a1 b
may initially present in their practice. The Physicians’7 A+ l5 F6 i7 J$ m) X: s* Y" D9 u, S
Desk Reference and package insert should also put a. z8 O; T1 {. a1 _, { M- H9 v
warning about the virilizing effect on a male or
; W# d/ G, W' R6 hfemale child who might come in contact with some-
; V- c8 x) G& c8 }one using any of these products.$ G! ]% }/ l$ o/ b! @7 U2 a. C7 ~
References
) M! \. o2 ?$ }' l) _, X1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation
/ x* ]; N9 a) S& ]and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric
0 a3 u# T- z! N6 y) @" _4 \Endocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;0 L, w$ [* Y3 A% |- x% y- b
2002: 565-628.$ m I" E! b) H8 T
2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious p( i$ Z1 g+ |' N$ ]8 i3 w
puberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|